<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crappy Logo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nineteenfortyone.com/2009/11/crappy-logo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nineteenfortyone.com/2009/11/crappy-logo/</link>
	<description>We don&#039;t report the news, we Create it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.nineteenfortyone.com/2009/11/crappy-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nineteenfortyone.com/?p=1402#comment-403</guid>
		<description>I guess it is not clear which is the parody logo and which are the actual logos. I have updated the graphic to make this distinction (even though it may be funnier to keep them ambiguous).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it is not clear which is the parody logo and which are the actual logos. I have updated the graphic to make this distinction (even though it may be funnier to keep them ambiguous).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://www.nineteenfortyone.com/2009/11/crappy-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nineteenfortyone.com/?p=1402#comment-402</guid>
		<description>That logo is so bad I thought it was a parody. I was wondering why you were just talking about how bad the logo was instead of showing it. I had to see that graphic on like three other sites before I realized that&#039;s is the logo.

I have to say, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.esarcasm.com/8164/aols-logo-a-go-go-new-brand-same-old-shit/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aol.Satan&lt;/a&gt; is my favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That logo is so bad I thought it was a parody. I was wondering why you were just talking about how bad the logo was instead of showing it. I had to see that graphic on like three other sites before I realized that&#8217;s is the logo.</p>
<p>I have to say, <a href="http://www.esarcasm.com/8164/aols-logo-a-go-go-new-brand-same-old-shit/" rel="nofollow">Aol.Satan</a> is my favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Sticka</title>
		<link>http://www.nineteenfortyone.com/2009/11/crappy-logo/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Sticka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nineteenfortyone.com/?p=1402#comment-401</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t help that the logo is from Wolff Olins, the same folks who brought us the WTF-eliciting WACOM rebrand and seizure-inducing London 2010 identity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t help that the logo is from Wolff Olins, the same folks who brought us the WTF-eliciting WACOM rebrand and seizure-inducing London 2010 identity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

